Ep. 113 Will Tax Cuts Mean Millions of Lost Manufacturing Jobs?

18 November 2017     |     Tom Woods     |     5

Krugman argues that the GOP tax plan, even on its own terms, would blow up the trade deficit and lead to millions of lost manufacturing jobs. We teach the economics behind his argument, but also mention–get ready for this–that Krugman leaves out two big factors that completely undercut his case.

Krugman Blog Post

Tax Cuts and the Trade Deficit” (November 14, 2017)

Related Link

Overview of the Senate’s Amendment to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Need More Episodes?

Tom and Bob have their own podcasts! Check out the Tom Woods Show and the Lara-Murphy Report.

Share this post:Digg thisShare on FacebookGoogle+Share on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on Twitter
  • http://2vnews.com 2VNews

    Production or consumption tax?
    Which is harder to do?
    Get someone to stop working.
    Get someone to stop buying things.

    • Daniel Campos

      Why not stop taxing people?

      If the government is so necessary, it can convince its funding without the employment of coercion;

      If the government, however, cannot convince its funding without the employment of coercion, then it is not necessary.

      • http://2vnews.com 2VNews

        The problem is more than half the world population expects things from government. One step at a time.

  • Intersnooze

    Good episode as usual. Mildly irked that after Murphy takes the listener through Krugman’s story, Woods goes off track with kitchen banter and it takes minutes to return to the subject at hand.

    The episode reminded me again of Russ Roberts’ point that “as economists, we’re always telling stories”. In other words, some policy change is proposed and the economist comes with a story saying “If you change A, this causes B, which results in C and D”.

    Now a skilled storyteller like Krugman will lull 98% of his readers into thinking ‘Yeah, that makes sense!’ and repeating the story to co-workers over coffee. It takes a bright guy like Murphy to remind us that ‘Waitaminute guys, his conclusion rests on this false assumption.” (In this case, no increased domestic investment).

    This particular story of Krugman’s is especially odious if you step back even further and think about what he’s really saying here: “If government reduces the cost of making stuff, stuff will get more expensive to make.”

    The corollary to his argument, I guess, is that government should raise taxes on businesses – you know, to make things cheaper.

  • davegrille

    The overall size of the spending as well as the taxing and borrowing is too large.